Mitochondria-lysosome membrane contact sites (MCS) represent dynamic, physical junctions where mitochondria and lysosomes are juxtaposed at distances of approximately 10-30 nanometers, enabling direct inter-organellar communication without requiring vesicle-mediated transport[1]. These contact sites have emerged as critical hubs for maintaining cellular homeostasis in neurons, integrating metabolic sensing, quality control, and signaling across two organelles whose dysfunction defines Parkinson's disease (PD) pathology.
The MCS hypothesis in PD proposes that genetic risk factors -- including mutations in GBA, LRRK2, SNCA, VPS35, PINK1, and PRKN (Parkin) -- converge on MCS dysregulation as a shared downstream pathogenic mechanism[2]. Disruption of MCS dynamics impairs bidirectional metabolite exchange (lipids, calcium, iron, amino acids), compromises autophagic and mitophagic flux, and creates a feedforward cycle of alpha-synuclein accumulation and progressive organelle dysfunction[3]. This page synthesizes the current mechanistic understanding of MCS dysfunction across the major PD-associated genetic pathways, the therapeutic implications, and the biomarkers and experimental techniques used to study this axis.
The physical maintenance of MCS requires proteins that span or bridge both organelle membranes. The primary molecular players are well-defined, primarily through the work of Krainc and colleagues at Northwestern University.
Rab7 GTPase System. The small GTPase Rab7 (RAB7A) on the lysosomal membrane is the central organizing molecule for MCS formation and maintenance[4]. Active, GTP-bound Rab7 on lysosomes recruits effector proteins that mediate physical tethering to mitochondria. The key negative regulator is TBC1D15, a Rab7-specific GTPase-activating protein (GAP) that is recruited to the mitochondrial outer membrane by Fis1 (Mitochondrial fission protein 1)[5]. TBC1D15 catalyzes GTP hydrolysis on Rab7, converting it from the active GTP-bound state to the inactive GDP-bound state, which dissociates from the lysosomal membrane and leads to contact untethering. This system provides a rapid, reversible mechanism for MCS formation and dissolution.
Mid51/Fis1 Oligomeric Complex. On the mitochondrial side, the Mitochondrial dynamics protein 51 (Mid51, also called MiD49 or MIEF1) and Fis1 proteins form a coupled oligomerization complex on the outer mitochondrial membrane[5:1]. Fis1 oligomerization recruits TBC1D15 to mitochondria, positioning it to act on Rab7 at contact sites. The Mid51(Fis1 complex drives the downstream pathway of inter-lysosomal untethering via Rab7 GTP hydrolysis. Critically, the Mid51(R169W) mutation, located in the oligomerization domain and potentially linked to PD, prevents proper lysosomal untethering -- demonstrating that MCS disassembly is as important as MCS assembly[5:2]. The Mid51(Y240N) mutation, associated with dominant optic atrophy, does not disrupt this pathway because it does not inhibit Mid51/Fis1 coupled oligomerization.
VDAC1 as a Tethering Scaffold. The voltage-dependent anion channel 1 (VDAC1) on the mitochondrial outer membrane has been identified as a potential tethering protein that interacts with lysosomal proteins to facilitate MCS formation[4:1]. VDAC1 may serve as a physical bridge or organize the mitochondrial membrane to accommodate contact site formation with lysosomes.
VPS13 Lipid Transfer Proteins. The VPS13 family (VPS13A, VPS13B, VPS13C, VPS13D) represents bridge-like lipid transfer proteins (BLTPs) that span the gap between organelle membranes at contact sites[6]. VPS13 proteins use an extended alpha-helical domain to bridge distances of 10-30 nm, transferring lipids from their site of synthesis in the endoplasmic reticulum to other organelles. Of direct relevance to PD, VPS13C loss-of-function mutations cause an autosomal recessive form of Parkinson's disease, while VPS13A mutations cause chorea-acanthocytosis[6:1]. Vps13a/Vps13c double knockout mice die embryonically, demonstrating partially redundant lipid flux functions between these two proteins. The VPS13 family highlights how MCS dysfunction can directly disrupt lipid trafficking essential for neuronal membrane homeostasis.
Three-way MCS at ER-Lysosome-Mitochondria Junctions. MCS are not always binary. ORP1L (Oxysterol-binding protein-related protein 1L) mediates PI(4)P signaling at three-way contact sites where the endoplasmic reticulum, lysosomes, and mitochondria converge[7]. ORP1L on lysosomes interacts with the ER-resident protein VAPB, creating a three-way junction. This architecture allows coordinated regulation of lipid transfer and mitochondrial dynamics from a single spatial hub, with implications for how PD mutations may disrupt multiple organelles simultaneously.
MCS are not merely structural -- they are functional conduits for bidirectional molecular exchange:
Calcium. Lysosomal calcium exits via the TRPML1 (mucolipin 1) channel on the lysosomal membrane, which is coordinated with mitochondrial calcium uptake through VDAC1 and the MCU (mitochondrial calcium uniporter) complex on the inner mitochondrial membrane[8]. This coordinate calcium exchange at MCS links lysosomal calcium homeostasis with mitochondrial bioenergetics. Lysosomal calcium release through TRPML1 is essential for proper autophagosome-lysosome fusion; when MCS dynamics are disrupted, lysosomal calcium reuptake is impaired, causing fusion failure.
Lipids. MCS facilitate direct lipid transfer between organelles. At mitochondria-lysosome contacts, cholesterol is transferred from lysosomes to mitochondria, and glucosylceramide (GlcCer) traffic between these compartments is regulated by GCase activity. The lipid composition of both organelle membranes directly affects MCS stability -- elevated GlcCer alters membrane curvature and the localization of tethering proteins, destabilizing contact sites[9].
Iron. Lysosomes serve as the primary cellular iron storage compartment, and iron is transferred from lysosomes to mitochondria at MCS. Disruption of this pathway leads to lysosomal iron accumulation, which promotes Fenton chemistry, oxidative stress, and lipofuscin formation -- all hallmarks of aged and PD neurons[10].
Amino Acids. A critical and often underappreciated function of MCS is the regulation of amino acid homeostasis between organelles[11]. Parkin-deficient neurons accumulate amino acids in lysosomes while showing amino acid deficiency in mitochondria, indicating that MCS normally mediate the bidirectional transfer of free amino acids between these compartments. This metabolic dysregulation may contribute significantly to neuronal vulnerability in PRKN-linked PD.
Homozygous or heterozygous GBA mutations (including N370S, L444P, 84GG) are the most significant genetic risk factor for PD, increasing risk by 5-20 fold depending on the specific mutation[9:1]. GBA encodes glucocerebrosidase (GCase), a lysosomal hydrolase that cleaves glucosylceramide (GlcCer) into glucose and ceramide. GCase dysfunction leads to GlcCer accumulation within lysosomes, which has several mechanistic consequences for MCS:
1. Disruption of TBC1D15-Mediated Rab7 GTP Hydrolysis. In iPSC-derived dopaminergic neurons from PD patients with GBA mutations (ΔGBA, 84GG), the Kim et al. (2021) study demonstrated prolonged mitochondria-lysosome contact duration -- contact sites that should untether after a normal time course remained abnormally stable[9:2]. This is paradoxical: loss of GCase activity leads to increased MCS duration rather than decreased formation. The mechanism involves defective TBC1D15-mediated Rab7 GTP hydrolysis. GlcCer accumulation disrupts the normal recruitment or function of TBC1D15 at contact sites, preventing Rab7 GTP hydrolysis and causing contacts to persist indefinitely. This prolonged tethering is non-functional -- the contacts remain physically apposed but cannot mediate proper metabolite exchange.
2. Membrane Composition Alterations. Elevated GlcCer changes the biophysical properties of the lysosomal membrane, affecting the localization and function of MCS-associated proteins. GlcCer accumulation also impairs lysosomal acidification and reduces functional GCase activity through a positive feedback loop[12]. Oxidized dopamine, which accumulates secondary to mitochondrial dysfunction in dopaminergic neurons, directly inhibits GCase activity, creating a vicious cycle between mitochondrial impairment, dopamine oxidation, and lysosomal GlcCer accumulation[12:1].
3. Rescue by GCase Modulators. A GCase-activity-enhancing small molecule (such as an allosteric modulator) or lentiviral TBC1D15 overexpression restores normal contact timing in GBA-mutant neurons, demonstrating both the reversibility of this mechanism and the specificity of the TBC1D15/Rab7 axis[9:3]. This finding is therapeutically significant.
Several biomarkers directly reflect GBA-linked MCS dysfunction in PD:
LRRK2 (Leucine-Rich Repeat Serine-Threonine Protein Kinase 2) mutations, particularly G2019S, are the most common cause of autosomal dominant PD. LRRK2 encodes aRab32/35 kinase whose hyperactivity phosphorylates a subset of Rab GTPases on a specific threonine residue (T73 on Rab10, equivalent positions on other Rab substrates)[15]. This phosphorylation functionally mislocalizes these Rab proteins, disrupting their normal membrane trafficking cycles.
Rab10 Phosphorylation and Optineurin Recruitment. The Manders et al. (2025) study in Brain demonstrated that the PD-causing VPS35(D620N) mutation leads to increased LRRK2 kinase activity, resulting in elevated phospho-Rab10 (pT73) levels[15:1]. Phospho-Rab10 impairs the mitochondrial recruitment of optineurin, a critical autophagy receptor that brings damaged mitochondria to lysosomes for mitophagy. Optineurin links ubiquitinated mitochondria to the autophagosome via its LC3-interacting region (LIR) domain. When Rab10 phosphorylation disrupts this recruitment, mitophagy is severely impaired.
VPS35/LRRK2 Axis. Endogenous VPS35 and LRRK2 are proximity partners in human dopaminergic neurons, and the D620N mutation enhances this proximity. VPS35 knockdown (but not wild-type VPS35 overexpression) rescues the mitophagy defect, indicating a gain-of-function mechanism for the mutation. Critically, LRRK2 kinase inhibitors fully rescue the mitophagy defect, as does overexpression of PPM1H, a phosphatase that dephosphorylates multiple LRRK2 Rab substrates[15:2]. This establishes a testable VPS35/LRRK2/Rab axis where MCS-dependent mitophagy can be restored pharmacologically.
Direct Effects on MCS Tethering. While the primary LRRK2 mechanism in MCS dysfunction involves Rab phosphorylation disrupting autophagy receptor recruitment, the broader effects of LRRK2 hyperactivity on MCS may include altered lysosomal positioning, disrupted Rab7 cycling, and impaired autophagosome-lysosome fusion[16]. LRRK2 mutations impinge on autophagosome formation, alter lysosomal pH, and dysregulate lysosomal calcium dynamics, resulting in impaired autophagosome-lysosome fusion and lysosome-mediated degradation.
Alpha-synuclein (SNCA) pathology and MCS dysfunction form a bidirectional, self-amplifying pathogenic circuit:
Alpha-Synuclein Directly Reduces MCS. Overexpression or aggregation of alpha-synuclein leads to a significant reduction in the number and function of mitochondria-lysosome contact sites[17]. Mutant forms of alpha-synuclein (A53T, A30P) associated with familial PD exhibit altered membrane binding properties that disrupt normal MCS dynamics. The mechanism involves interference with tethering proteins on both mitochondrial and lysosomal membranes, alterations in lipid metabolism at contact sites, and direct effects on lysosomal function[18].
Mitochondrial Protein Import Inhibition. Post-translationally modified species of alpha-synuclein (including phosphorylated and nitrated forms) bind with high affinity to TOM20 on the mitochondrial outer membrane[19]. This binding prevents the TOM20-TOM22 co-receptor interaction, impairing mitochondrial protein import. The resulting deficient mitochondrial respiration and enhanced ROS production further destabilize MCS. Both modest knockdown of endogenous alpha-synuclein and overexpression of TOM20 are sufficient to preserve mitochondrial protein import, providing two independent rescue strategies.
Impaired Autophagic Clearance of Alpha-Synuclein. When MCS dynamics are disrupted by any of the mechanisms above (GBA dysfunction, LRRK2 hyperactivity, or direct alpha-synuclein toxicity), autophagosome-lysosome fusion is impaired. This prevents the clearance of aggregated alpha-synuclein, which further accumulates and imposes additional stress on MCS and organelle quality control systems.
Pathogenic Feedback Cycle. The Brooker et al. (2024) model articulates a feedback cycle where: (1) mitochondrial impairment causes oxidative stress and toxic oxidized dopamine accumulation; (2) oxidized dopamine reduces GCase activity and impairs lysosomal function; (3) lysosomal defects impair both oxidized dopamine processing and alpha-synuclein clearance; (4) accumulated alpha-synuclein further disrupts MCS and mitochondrial function[12:2]. The MCS sits at the nexus of this cycle, making it both a consequence and amplifier of the entire pathogenic cascade.
Parkin (PRKN), an E3 ubiquitin ligase whose loss-of-function mutations cause autosomal recessive early-onset PD, has a direct and specific role at MCS beyond its canonical function in mitophagy[11:1]. The Peng et al. (2023) Science Advances study demonstrated that:
Parkin Stabilizes Active Rab7 to Maintain MCS. Wild-type parkin promotes mitochondria-lysosome tethering through its ubiquitination activity. The catalytically inactive Parkin(C431S) mutant fails to maintain normal contact dynamics, showing reduced MCS number. Parkin normally stabilizes active, GTP-bound Rab7 at lysosomes, which is essential for maintaining MCS formation. In parkin-deficient neurons, Rab7 is less stable at lysosomes, reducing MCS number.
Amino Acid Homeostasis at MCS. Subcellular metabolomics in parkin-mutant neurons reveals amino acid accumulation within lysosomes and amino acid deficiency within mitochondria[11:2]. This reflects the loss of a MCS-mediated function distinct from mitophagy: the bidirectional transfer of free amino acids between organelles. Mitochondria require a constant supply of certain amino acids for metabolic processes including the urea cycle and gluconeogenesis; when MCS are reduced, this supply is disrupted.
TBC1D15 Knockdown Restores MCS. Reducing TBC1D15 (the Rab7 GAP) restores M/L tethering and improves amino acid profiles in parkin-deficient neurons[11:3]. This is because in the absence of parkin's stabilizing effect on active Rab7, TBC1D15 is unopposed, causing excessive Rab7 GTP hydrolysis and premature contact untethering. TBC1D15 knockdown shifts the equilibrium toward more active Rab7 and restored MCS.
VPS35, a component of the retromer complex, is involved in the removal of Drp1 complexes from mitochondria for delivery to lysosomes or peroxisomes through mitochondrial-derived vesicles (MDVs)[16:1]. The VPS35(D620N) mutation causes autosomal dominant PD through a gain-of-function mechanism that enhances LRRK2 kinase activity, as described above[15:3]. This creates an interesting convergence: VPS35 mutations affect the same mitophagy pathway as PINK1 and Parkin, but through a different mechanism (LRRK2 kinase hyperactivity rather than direct loss of the mitophagy machinery).
PINK1, the kinase that activates Parkin in response to mitochondrial depolarization, initiates the canonical PINK1/parkin-mediated mitophagy pathway[20]. While PINK1's direct role at MCS is less characterized than Parkin's, its dysfunction leads to accumulation of damaged mitochondria that would normally be cleared at MCS. The Vrijsen et al. (2022) review highlights that disturbed MCS are implicated across neurodegenerative diseases, with PD-linked proteins (including PINK1, Parkin, alpha-synuclein, LRRK2, DJ-1) involved in the regulation of multiple contact sites including ER-mitochondria (MAMs) and mitochondria-lysosome contacts[21].
The Ma et al. (2023) study in Nature Communications identified small molecule enhancers of mitochondria-lysosome contacts that promote contact formation and enhance MCS function[22]. These compounds could potentially improve mitochondrial quality control by enhancing MCS-mediated mitophagy and restoring metabolite transfer between organelles. The search for optimized, CNS-penetrant MCS enhancers is an active area of therapeutic development.
TBC1D15 Modulation. In GBA-linked PD, TBC1D15 overexpression normalizes contact timing by compensating for the defective Rab7 GTP hydrolysis caused by GlcCer accumulation[9:4]. In PRKN-linked PD, TBC1D15 knockdown has the same restorative effect by preventing excessive Rab7 inactivation[11:4]. These opposing strategies for the same target (TBC1D15) in different genetic contexts highlight the importance of patient stratification for therapeutic targeting.
Rab7 Stabilization. Compounds that stabilize active GTP-bound Rab7 at lysosomes would promote MCS maintenance. This could be achieved through inhibition of Rab7 GAPs (specific to certain genetic contexts) or through direct Rab7 nucleotide exchange enhancement.
LRRK2 kinase inhibitors (e.g., DNL151, BIIB122) have reached clinical trials for PD. Their ability to reduce phospho-Rab10 levels and restore optineurin-mediated mitophagy represents a direct therapeutic approach for the LRRK2-mediated component of MCS dysfunction[15:4]. The finding that LRRK2 inhibitors fully rescue the VPS35(D620N) mitophagy defect broadens the potential indication for these drugs beyond LRRK2 mutation carriers.
PPM1H, a Rab phosphatase that dephosphorylates multiple LRRK2 Rab substrates, restores mitophagy when overexpressed in VPS35(D620N) cells[15:5]. Gene therapy approaches to enhance PPM1H expression in neurons could provide a complementary strategy to small-molecule LRRK2 inhibitors.
Allosteric modulators of GCase activity (e.g., NCG-1, ambroxol derivatives) represent a therapeutic approach specifically for GBA-linked PD[9:5]. These compounds enhance residual GCase activity, reducing GlcCer accumulation and restoring normal MCS dynamics. Ambroxol, a chaperone therapy already in clinical trials for GBA-PD, has shown promise in restoring GCase trafficking and reducing substrate accumulation.
The VPS13 family of lipid transfer proteins at membrane contact sites represents an emerging therapeutic target[6:2]. Strategies to enhance VPS13 lipid transfer activity or create artificial inter-organelle contact sites to bypass lost endogenous contacts are in development. For VPS13C-linked PD, enhancing residual VPS13C function or compensating for its lipid transfer deficiency could restore MCS lipid flux.
Confocal Microscopy. Standard live-cell confocal microscopy with mitochondrial (Mito-RFP) and lysosomal (Lyso-GFP) markers enables visualization of contact site formation and dynamics in real time[9:6]. Time-lapse imaging allows measurement of contact duration, frequency, and spatial distribution.
Super-Resolution Structured Illumination Microscopy (N-SIM). Three-dimensional structured illumination microscopy provides ~100 nm lateral resolution, sufficient to resolve individual mitochondria-lysosome contacts in cells[9:7]. This technique has been essential for quantitative measurements of MCS number and morphology.
TIRF Microscopy. Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence microscopy selectively excites fluorophores within ~100 nm of the coverslip, providing exceptional signal-to-noise ratio for visualizing MCS at the plasma membrane-proximal region. TIRF is particularly useful for studying MCS dynamics in flat cellular regions.
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). EM provides the highest resolution (~0.5 nm) for visualizing MCS structure and confirming physical proximity between organelles[9:8]. Cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) enables near-atomic resolution visualization of MCS architecture, including the identification of tethering protein complexes spanning the inter-organelle gap.
Immuno-EM. Combining antibody-based protein detection with EM allows visualization of specific MCS components (Rab7, TBC1D15, Fis1) at the ultrastructural level.
Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA). In situ PLA has been used to demonstrate that VPS35 and LRRK2 are proximity partners in human dopaminergic neurons[15:6]. PLA generates a fluorescent signal when two target proteins are within ~40 nm, providing spatial interaction data in native cellular contexts.
Subcellular Fractionation. Isolation of MCS-enriched fractions allows biochemical characterization of the proteins and lipids present at contact sites.
Proteomics. Mass spectrometry of MCS preparations has identified the full complement of contact site proteins[@mcgowan2019], including tethers, signaling molecules, and metabolic enzymes.
| Biomarker | Source | Change in PD/MCS Dysfunction | Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glucosylceramide (GlcCer) | CSF | Elevated in GBA-PD | Direct substrate accumulation from GCase loss[13:1] |
| GCase Activity | Blood mononuclear cells, CSF | Reduced | Loss of lysosomal function[14:3] |
| Alpha-Synuclein | CSF | Elevated | Impaired autophagic clearance[14:4] |
| Neurofilament Light (NfL) | CSF, blood | Elevated; correlates with LRRK2 G2019S genotype | Neuroaxonal degeneration; LRRK2-associated cognitive decline[@yang2023;@lerche2020] |
| Sphingolipid ratios (GlcCer:Ceramide) | CSF | Elevated ratio | Sensitive indicator of GCase flux impairment[14:5] |
| Mitochondrial DNA copy number | Blood | Reduced | Impaired mitochondrial biogenesis/mitophagy |
| Ferritin | CSF | Elevated | Lysosomal iron accumulation[10:1] |
[GBA Mutation] → GlcCer accumulation → TBC1D15 dysfunction → Prolonged MCS
↓ (non-functional)
[LRRK2 Hyperactivity] → Rab10 phosphorylation → Optineurin mislocalization
↓
Impaired mitophagy
↓
[Parkin/PINK1 Loss] → Reduced active Rab7 → Fewer MCS → Lysosomal amino acid accumulation
↓
Mitochondrial amino acid deficiency
↓
[Alpha-Synuclein Aggregation] → MCS reduction → TOM20/TOM22 disruption
↓ ↓
Impaired mitophagy Mitochondrial protein import failure
↓ ↓
MORE alpha-synuclein accumulation (autophagy blocked)
↓
FEEDFORWARD CYCLE
This integrated model places MCS at the convergence point of all major PD genetic risk factors. Each pathway -- GBA (lipid metabolism), LRRK2 (Rab signaling), Parkin/PINK1 (mitophagy initiation), and SNCA (aggregation) -- disrupts a specific aspect of MCS structure or function. The MCS, in turn, coordinates the processes (lipid transfer, calcium signaling, mitophagy, amino acid homeostasis) whose disruption drives alpha-synuclein accumulation and neuronal death.
Wong YC, Ysselstein D, Krainc D. "Mitochondria-lysosome contact sites in neurodegeneration". Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018. ↩︎
Krainc D. "Mitochondria-lysosome contacts in Parkinson's disease". Nat Rev Neurol. 2020. ↩︎
Cisneros J, Belton TB, Shum GC, Molakal CG, Wong YC. "Mitochondria-lysosome contact site dynamics and misregulation in neurodegenerative diseases". Trends Neurosci. 2022. ↩︎
Du Y, Wang J, Li H, et al. "Rab7 regulates mitochondria-lysosome contact sites and mitophagy". Autophagy. 2022. ↩︎ ↩︎
Wong YC, Kim S, Cisneros J, Molakal CG, Song P, Lubbe SJ, Krainc D. "Mid51/Fis1 mitochondrial oligomerization complex drives lysosomal untethering and network dynamics". J Cell Biol. 2022. ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Neiman AM. "Pharmacological interventions for lipid transport disorders". Front Neurosci. 2023. ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Boutry M, Kim PK. "ORP1L mediated PI(4)P signaling at ER-lysosome-mitochondrion three-way contact contributes to mitochondrial division". Nat Commun. 2021. ↩︎
Zhou J, Ng S, Adekunle D, et al. "Calcium signaling at mitochondria-lysosome contact sites". Cell Calcium. 2022. ↩︎
Kim S, Wong YC, Gao F, Krainc D. "Dysregulation of mitochondria-lysosome contacts by GBA1 dysfunction in dopaminergic neuronal models of Parkinson's disease". Nat Commun. 2021. ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Sironi L, Restelli LM, Tolnay M, Neutzner A, Frank S. "Dysregulated Interorganellar Crosstalk of Mitochondria in the Pathogenesis of Parkinson's Disease". Cells. 2020. ↩︎ ↩︎
Peng W, Schröder LF, Song P, Wong YC, Krainc D. "Parkin regulates amino acid homeostasis at mitochondria-lysosome contact sites in Parkinson's disease". Sci Adv. 2023. ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Brooker SM, Naylor GE, Krainc D. "Cell biology of Parkinson's disease: Mechanisms of synaptic, lysosomal, and mitochondrial dysfunction". Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2024. ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Castillo-Ribelles L, Arranz-Amo JA, Hernández-Vara J, et al. "Evaluation of a Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for the Analysis of Glucosylceramide and Galactosylceramide Isoforms in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Parkinson's Disease Patients". Anal Chem. 2024. ↩︎ ↩︎
Lerche S, Schulte C, Wurster I, et al. "The Mutation Matters: CSF Profiles of GCase, Sphingolipids, alpha-Synuclein in PD(GBA)". Mov Disord. 2021. ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Manders L, Heyninck T, Imberechts D, Holst B, Krüger R, Vandenberghe W. "VPS35 mutation inhibits PINK1/parkin-mediated mitophagy via increased LRRK2 kinase activity". Brain. 2025. ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Vidyadhara DJ, Lee JE, Chandra SS. "Role of the endolysosomal system in Parkinson's disease". J Neurochem. 2019. ↩︎ ↩︎
Lin KJ, Lin KL, Wang YF, et al. "Alpha-synuclein aggregation reduces mitochondria-lysosome contact sites". Neurobiol Aging. 2022. ↩︎
Lee HJ, Bae EJ, Lee SJ, et al. "Alpha-synuclein and mitochondria-lysosome contacts". Mov Disord. 2020. ↩︎
Liu H, Shao W, Liu W, Shang W, Liu JP, Wang L, Tong C. "PtdIns4P exchange at endoplasmic reticulum-autolysosome contacts is essential for autophagy and neuronal homeostasis". Autophagy. 2023. ↩︎
Malpartida AB, Williamson M, Narendra DP, Wade-Martins R, Ryan BJ. "Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Mitophagy in Parkinson's Disease: From Mechanism to Therapy". Trends Biochem Sci. 2021. ↩︎
Vrijsen S, Vrancx C, Del Vecchio M, Swinnen JV, Agostinis P, Winderickx J, Vangheluwe P, Annaert W. "Inter-organellar Communication in Parkinson's and Alzheimer's Disease: Looking Beyond Endoplasmic Reticulum-Mitochondria Contact Sites". Front Neurosci. 2022. ↩︎
Ma K, Chen G, Li W, et al. "Small molecule enhancers of mitochondria-lysosome contacts". Nat Commun. 2023. ↩︎