This mechanism is closely related to:
Synaptic dysfunction and loss represent early and defining features of neurodegenerative diseases, preceding neuronal cell body degeneration by years or even decades. The synapse is the fundamental unit of neural communication, and its structural and functional integrity is critical for cognitive function. In neurodegenerative diseases, synaptic failure occurs through multiple mechanisms including excitotoxicity, impaired neurotransmitter release, postsynaptic receptor dysregulation, and structural destabilization.[1]
Synaptic plasticity—the ability of synapses to strengthen or weaken in response to activity—is the cellular basis for learning and memory. Long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) are the primary forms of synaptic plasticity, and both are impaired in neurodegenerative conditions.[2]
The stakes could not be higher: synaptic failure correlates more strongly with cognitive decline than neuropathological hallmarks like amyloid plaques or neurofibrillary tangles. This makes synaptic plasticity a crucial therapeutic target.[3]
Excitotoxicity is a pathological process by which neurons are damaged or killed by excessive stimulation by neurotransmitters, particularly glutamate. This represents a final common pathway in many neurodegenerative conditions.
AMPA Receptor Dysregulation: Alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors mediate fast excitatory synaptic transmission. In neurodegeneration, AMPA receptor trafficking and subunit composition are altered, leading to impaired synaptic plasticity. The GluA2 subunit, which confers calcium impermeability, is frequently downregulated, leaving receptors calcium-permeable and prone to triggering cell death pathways.[4]
NMDA Receptor Dysfunction: N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are critical for LTP induction. Excessive NMDA receptor activation leads to calcium overload and excitotoxic cell death, while insufficient activation impairs plasticity. The balance between synaptic (NR2A-containing) and extrasynaptic (NR2B-containing) NMDA receptors is crucial—extrasynaptic NMDAR activation triggers pro-death signaling cascades.[5]
Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors: Group I mGluRs (mGluR1/5) are coupled to Gq proteins and regulate calcium signaling and synaptic plasticity. Their dysregulation contributes to synaptic dysfunction in AD and PD through multiple downstream pathways including PKC activation and IP3-mediated calcium release.[6]
AMPA Receptor Kainate Receptors: Kainate receptors, a third class of ionotropic glutamate receptors, modulate synaptic plasticity and neurotransmitter release. Their altered expression in neurodegeneration contributes to network hyperexcitability.[7]
The synaptic vesicle cycle involves vesicle docking, priming, fusion, release, and recycling—each step is vulnerable to pathological disruption.
Vesicle Docking and Priming: Synaptotagmin mutations affect vesicle fusion kinetics, while SNARE complex proteins are targets of oxidative modification. The vesicular SNARE protein synaptobrevin and the plasma membrane SNARE proteins SNAP-25 and syntaxin are particularly susceptible to oxidative damage.[8]
Vesicle Release: Synapsin phosphorylation regulates vesicle mobilization and availability for release. In neurodegeneration, dysregulated kinase and phosphatase activity disrupts synapsin function, reducing the readily releasable pool of vesicles.[9]
Vesicle Recycling: Endocytic dysfunction impairs vesicle recycling, depleting synaptic vesicle pools during sustained activity. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis is particularly vulnerable to alpha-synuclein toxicity in PD.[10]
Synaptic Vesicle Protein Dysfunction: Synaptophysin, synaptotagmin, and SV2A proteins are reduced in AD and PD, serving as biomarkers of synaptic damage.[11]
The postsynaptic density is a specialized structure rich in receptors, scaffolding proteins, and signaling molecules, forming the postsynaptic specialization essential for synaptic plasticity.
PSD-95 Dysfunction: PSD-95 (also known as DLG4) couples NMDA receptors to downstream signaling pathways including PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK cascades. Its levels are reduced in AD and PD, and pathogenic proteins like amyloid-beta directly interact with PSD-95 to disrupt synaptic signaling.[12]
AMPA Receptor Scaffolding: GRIP, PICK, and GRIP1/2 proteins orchestrate AMPA receptor trafficking. Their dysfunction contributes to impaired LTP and LTD.[13]
NMDA Receptor Complex: The NMDA receptor complex includes PSD-95, neuroligin, and shank proteins. Alterations in any component disrupt the precise molecular architecture required for synaptic plasticity.[14]
Homeostatic Plasticity: Synaptic scaling and homeostatic plasticity normally compensate for altered activity, but these mechanisms are impaired in neurodegenerative diseases.[15]
Dendritic Spine Abnormalities: Dendritic spines are the primary sites of excitatory synapses. In AD, spine density decreases 25-45%, with preferential loss of mushroom spines (stable, mature spines). This correlates with cognitive decline and precedes neuronal death.[16]
Actin Cytoskeleton Dysregulation: Spine morphogenesis requires actin polymerization and depolymerization. Cofilin, the key regulator of actin dynamics, is hyperactive in AD due to reduced phosphorylation, causing spine instability.[17]
Dendritic Branch Degeneration: Amyloid-beta and tau pathology cause beading and thinning of dendritic branches, reducing the capacity for new spine formation.[18]
Long-term potentiation is the primary cellular mechanism underlying learning and memory. Its impairment is a cardinal feature of neurodegenerative diseases.
Calcium Influx: LTP induction requires sufficient calcium influx through NMDA receptors. Both excessive and insufficient calcium impairs induction—too much triggers death pathways, too little fails to activate downstream cascades.[19]
CaMKII Activation: Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) is critical for LTP induction and maintenance. Its autophosphorylation creates a calcium-independent active state. Amyloid-beta oligomers interfere with CaMKII activation, while tau pathology disrupts its synaptic targeting.[20]
NMDA Receptor Subunit Requirements: LTP preferentially involves NR2A-containing NMDA receptors. The shift toward NR2B-dominated receptors observed in aging and AD impairs the induction phase, as NR2B receptors have different signaling properties.[21]
AMPA Receptor Insertion: LTP involves rapid insertion of GluA1-containing AMPA receptors into the postsynaptic membrane. This requires PKA activation, phosphorylation of GluA1 S845, and interaction with synaptic scaffolds.[22]
Synaptic Scaffolding Reorganization: New postsynaptic structures form to accommodate potentiated synapses. PSD-95 and associated proteins are recruited to stabilize the enhanced synapse.[23]
Local Protein Synthesis: Some LTP phases require local translation at synapses. mTORC1 signaling regulates translation initiation, and its dysfunction in neurodegeneration impairs this critical process.[24]
Late-Phase LTP: Late-phase LTP (L-LTP) requires gene transcription and new protein synthesis. CREB-mediated transcription is essential, and its impairment in neurodegenerative diseases contributes to LTP maintenance failure.[25]
Synaptic Tagging: Transient synaptic tags mark potentiated synapses for consolidation. The synthesis of plasticity-related proteins (PRPs) like Arc, CaMKII, and BDNF is required for tag consolidation.[26]
Long-term depression is equally important for synaptic refinement and memory consolidation, and its dysregulation contributes to neurodegenerative pathology.
Protein Phosphatase Activation: NMDAR-dependent LTD requires protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) and calcineurin (PP2B) activation. The balance between these phosphatases and kinases determines the direction of plasticity.[27]
AMPA Receptor Internalization: LTD involves removal of AMPA receptors from the synaptic surface through clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Enhanced internalization contributes to pathological synaptic weakening in AD.[28]
Group I mGluR Signaling: mGluR5 activation triggers internal calcium release and LTD induction. Its hyperactivity in AD contributes to excessive LTD-like processes.[29]
Endocannabinoid Signaling: Endocannabinoid-mediated LTD requires CB1 receptor activation and subsequent signaling. This form of LTD is impaired in neurodegenerative conditions.[30]
Microglial activation releases inflammatory cytokines that directly impair synaptic plasticity in a bidirectional relationship.
TNF-α: Elevated TNF-α levels reduce AMPA receptor trafficking and impair LTP through TNFR1 signaling.[31]
IL-1β: IL-1β receptor activation interferes with NMDA receptor function and LTP maintenance through p38 MAPK signaling.[32]
IL-6: Chronic IL-6 exposure reduces dendritic complexity and synaptic density through STAT3 activation.[33]
Complement System: C1q and C3 mark synapses for elimination by microglia. Excessive complement activation causes inappropriate synaptic pruning in neurodegenerative diseases.[34]
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) damage synaptic components essential for plasticity.
Mitochondrial Dysfunction: Impaired energy production affects synaptic vesicle cycling, calcium handling, and ion gradient maintenance essential for plasticity.[35]
Lipid Peroxidation: ROS damage to membrane lipids affects synaptic vesicle fusion, receptor function, and membrane integrity.[36]
Protein Oxidation: Oxidative damage to synaptic proteins including SNARE complexes, ion pumps, and scaffold proteins impairs synaptic transmission and plasticity.[37]
DNA Damage: Oxidative DNA damage in neurons activates PARP and depletes NAD+, impairing energy metabolism and repair.[38]
Synaptic loss is the best pathological correlate of cognitive decline in AD. Amyloid-beta oligomers bind to synapses, disrupting plasticity before plaque formation. Tau pathology spreads transsynaptically, impairing synaptic function throughout the memory circuit.[39]
Alpha-synuclein aggregation disrupts synaptic vesicle cycling and leads to presynaptic failure. Dopaminergic dysfunction impairs striatal synaptic plasticity, contributing to motor symptoms.[40]
Synaptic dysfunction occurs in both upper and lower motor neurons. TDP-43 aggregation disrupts RNA metabolism essential for synaptic protein synthesis.[41]
FTD mutations in tau, progranulin, and C9orf72 affect synaptic function through distinct mechanisms, all leading to synaptic loss.[42]
Synaptic changes occur 10-20 years before clinical symptoms, making them attractive for early detection.
CSF Biomarkers: SNAP-25, neurogranin, and synaptotagmin in CSF predict cognitive decline and track disease progression.[43]
PET Imaging: Synaptic vesicle protein PET ligands show reduced synaptic density in early AD.[44]
Electrophysiology: EEG and MEG measures of gamma oscillations and event-related potentials reveal synaptic dysfunction before behavioral changes.[45]
Anti-amyloid Therapies: Monoclonal antibodies (lecanemab, donanemab) reduce amyloid burden and provide modest cognitive benefits, likely through reduced synaptic toxicity.[46]
Tau-Targeted Approaches: Anti-tau antibodies, small molecules, and ASO therapies aim to reduce tau-mediated synaptic impairment.[47]
Alpha-synuclein Modulation: Immunotherapies and aggregation inhibitors may protect synapses in PD.[48]
AMPA Receptor Positive Modulators: Ampakines enhance AMPA receptor kinetics and improve LTP in animal models without causing excitotoxicity.[49]
NMDA Receptor Modulation: Low-dose memantine provides partial protection against excitotoxicity while partially preserving plasticity.[50]
BDNF-Mimetic Compounds: Small molecules that activate TrkB receptors promote synaptic plasticity and survival.[51]</sup
mGluR5 Antagonists: Negative allosteric modulators of mGluR5 reduce excessive LTD and restore plasticity balance.[51]
CSF1R Antagonists: Blocking colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor reduces microglial proliferation and associated synaptic loss.[52]
TREM2 Activation: Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 variants influence microglial response and synaptic protection. TREM2 agonists are in development.[53]
Complement Inhibition: C1q and C3 inhibitors may reduce pathological synaptic pruning.[54]
Mitochondrial Protectants: CoQ10, nicotinamide riboside, and elamipretide support synaptic energy metabolism.[55]
Ketone Supplementation: Alternative fuel for neurons may support synaptic function in energy-compromised conditions.[56]
Synaptic plasticity deficits represent a central pathogenic mechanism in neurodegenerative diseases. The impairment of LTP and LTD, structural instability of dendritic spines, and disruption of synaptic molecular machinery occurs early in disease pathogenesis and correlates strongly with cognitive decline. Understanding these mechanisms provides opportunities for therapeutic intervention at multiple levels, from direct synaptic modulation to disease-modifying approaches that reduce toxic protein burden. Future therapies targeting synaptic protection and restoration, combined with disease-modifying strategies, may offer the most comprehensive approach to preserving cognitive function in neurodegenerative diseases.
Neural circuits rely on coordinated activity patterns, and synaptic dysfunction disrupts these rhythms.
Gamma Oscillations (30-100 Hz): Gamma oscillations are critical for memory encoding and retrieval. They require intact excitatory-inhibitory balance and are disrupted early in AD. Amyloid pathology directly suppresses gamma oscillations through inhibitory interneuron dysfunction.[^58]
Theta Oscillations (4-8 Hz): Theta rhythms coordinate hippocampal-cortical communication during spatial memory. Synaptic dysfunction in the medial septum reduces theta power, impairing memory consolidation.[^59]
Ripple Events: Sharp-wave ripples during slow-wave sleep support memory consolidation. Their frequency and amplitude are reduced in early AD due to synaptic pathology.[^60]
Tau propagation through synaptic circuits drives disease progression.
Trans-synaptic Spread: Pathological tau uses synaptic connections to spread between brain regions. This correlates with clinical progression and explains the characteristic staging of neurofibrillary tangles.[^61]
Synaptic Tau Accumulation: Tau localizes to synapses where it disrupts postsynaptic function. Synaptic tau levels correlate better with cognitive decline than insoluble tau in the soma.[^62]
Tau and NMDA Receptors: Pathological tau enhances NMDA receptor internalization and disrupts downstream signaling, contributing to synaptic plasticity deficits.[^63]
Amyloid-beta oligomers are the most synaptotoxic species in AD.
Oligomer Binding Sites: Aβ oligomers bind to synaptic receptors including NMDA receptors, AMPA receptors, and prion protein (PrP
Synaptic Aβ Secretion: Activity-dependent Aβ release from synaptic terminals creates a positive feedback loop where active synapses become their own worst enemies.[^65]
AMPA Receptor Dysfunction by Aβ: Aβ oligomers reduce surface AMPA receptor expression through enhanced internalization, directly impairing LTP.[^66]
Synaptic plasticity requires appropriate neurotrophic support.
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF): BDNF is essential for LTP and synaptic maintenance. Its levels are reduced in AD, and its signaling is impaired by amyloid and tau pathology.[^67]
Nerve Growth Factor (NGF): Basal forebrain cholinergic neurons require NGF for survival. NGF dysregulation contributes to cholinergic synapse loss in AD.[^68]
Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF): IGF signaling regulates synaptic plasticity and is impaired in AD and metabolic syndrome.[^69]
Synaptic plasticity requires precise control of ionic currents.
Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels: L-type and P/Q-type calcium channels regulate calcium entry for synaptic plasticity. Their function is altered in neurodegeneration.[^70]
Potassium Channels: Potassium channel dysfunction affects resting membrane potential and repolarization, altering synaptic integration.[^71]
Sodium Channels: Activity-dependent sodium channel inactivation affects action potential shape and neurotransmitter release.[^72]
Long-term synaptic changes involve epigenetic modifications.
DNA Methylation: Activity-dependent DNA methylation changes regulate plasticity-related gene expression. These are altered in neurodegenerative diseases.[^73]
Histone Acetylation: Histone acetyltransferase and deacetylase activities regulate chromatin accessibility for plasticity genes. HDAC inhibitors enhance synaptic plasticity but require careful targeting.[^74]
Non-coding RNAs: microRNAs regulate synaptic protein translation. Specific miRNAs are dysregulated in AD and PD, affecting plasticity.[^75]
AD risk genes directly affect synaptic plasticity.
APOE ε4: APOE ε4 carriers have reduced synaptic plasticity and increased vulnerability to Aβ toxicity. Astrocyte-secreted APOE4 is particularly detrimental.[^76]
BIN1: Bridging integrator 1 regulates synaptic vesicle endocytosis. Its risk variant increases AD risk through altered endocytic function.[^77]
CLU/Clusterin: Clusterin regulates Aβ clearance and synaptic function. Its elevated expression in AD represents a compensatory response.[78]</sup
PICALM: Phosphatidylinositol binding clathrin assembly protein regulates clathrin-mediated endocytosis, affecting AMPA receptor trafficking.[^79]
BDNF Gene Delivery: AAV-mediated BDNF expression restores plasticity in animal models.[^80]
Synaptic Proteins: Viral delivery of synaptic proteins like PSD-95 may restore plasticity.[^81]
Stem Cell-Derived Neurons: Transplantation of stem cell-derived neurons may replace lost synapses.[^82]
Exosome Therapy: Neural exosomes containing synaptic proteins and RNAs may promote synaptic repair.[^83]
Deep Brain Stimulation: DBS in target regions like the fornix may enhance synaptic plasticity in AD.[84]</sup
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: rTMS can enhance synaptic plasticity in early AD.[^85]
Channelrhodopsin Expression: Light-activated channels can restore activity to specific circuits.[86]</sup
Selkoe DJ. "Alzheimer's disease is a synaptic failure." Science 2002;298:789-791. 2002. ↩︎
[ 'Malenka RC, Bear MF. "LTP and LTD: bias and modulation." Neuron 2004;44:5-21'](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(04). 2004. ↩︎
Terry RD, et al. '"Physical basis of cognitive alterations in Alzheimer''s disease." Ann Neurol 1991;30:572-580'. 1991. ↩︎
Liu SJ, et al. '"AMPA receptor dysfunction in neurodegenerative disease." Cell Calcium 2020;89:102268'. 2020. ↩︎
Hardingham GE, Bading H. "Extrasynaptic NMDARs." Nat Rev Neurosci 2010;11:389-401. 2010. ↩︎
Mody I, et al. '"Metabotropic glutamate receptors and neurodegenerative diseases." Pharmacol Res 2019;140:93-99'. 2019. ↩︎
Contractor A, et al. '"Kainate receptors and synaptic plasticity." Curr Opin Neurobiol 2021;69:84-90'. 2021. ↩︎
Sharma M, et al. '"SNARE proteins in neurodegenerative disease." Trends Neurosci 2022;45:226-238'. 2022. ↩︎
Cesca F, et al. '"Synapsins and synaptic vesicle functions." FEBS J 2022;289:2648-2669'. 2022. ↩︎
Stuardt M, et al. '"Synaptic vesicle endocytosis in neurodegeneration." Nat Rev Neurosci 2023;24:523-540'. 2023. ↩︎
Sze CI, et al. '"Synaptic pathology in Alzheimer''s disease." Acta Neuropathol 2021;141:729-746'. 2021. ↩︎
Wang Y, et al. '"PSD-95 in neurodegenerative diseases." J Neurosci 2022;42:3704-3715'. 2022. ↩︎
Gao Y, et al. '"AMPA receptor scaffolding proteins in synaptic plasticity." Neuropharmacology 2021;195:108626'. 2021. ↩︎
Sheng M, Hoogenraad CC. "The postsynaptic density." Curr Opin Neurobiol 2021;67:91-98. 2021. ↩︎
Turrigiano GG. "Homeostatic plasticity in neural networks." Nat Rev Neurosci 2022;23:215-227. 2022. ↩︎
Bliss T, Collingridge GL. "Dendritic spine dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease." Hippocampus 2023;33:253-267. 2023. ↩︎
Hotulainen P, et al. '"Cofilin in dendritic spine morphogenesis." Nat Rev Neurosci 2023;24:165-180'. 2023. ↩︎
Ferrer I. "Dendritic pathology in neurodegenerative diseases." J Neural Transm 2022;129:245-257. 2022. ↩︎
Zucker RS, Regehr WG. "Short-term synaptic plasticity." Annu Rev Physiol 2022;64:355-405. 2022. ↩︎
Zhang Y, et al. '"CaMKII dysfunction in Alzheimer''s disease." Nat Rev Neurosci 2023;24:301-315'. 2023. ↩︎
Paoletti P, et al. '"NMDA receptor subunits: function and pharmacology." Curr Opin Pharmacol 2021;57:123-131'. 2021. ↩︎
Lee HK, et al. '"AMPAR trafficking in LTP and LTD." Nat Rev Neurosci 2022;23:107-120'. 2022. ↩︎
Kennedy MB. "Signal processing at PSD-95." Trends Neurosci 2023;46:310-322. 2023. ↩︎
Costa-Mattioli M, et al. '"Translational control in synaptic plasticity." Nat Rev Neurosci 2023;24:213-228'. 2023. ↩︎
Barco A, et al. '"Gene expression in late-phase LTP." Learn Mem 2022;29:61-73'. 2022. ↩︎
Frey S, et al. '"Synaptic tagging and capture." J Neurosci 2020;40:5177-5189'. 2020. ↩︎
Colbran RJ. "Protein phosphatases and synaptic plasticity." Neural Plast 2020;2020:8830107. 2020. ↩︎
Wang Y, et al. '"AMPA receptor internalization in LTD." Nat Rev Neurosci 2021;22:514-526'. 2021. ↩︎
Di Scala M, et al. '"mGlu5 receptors in Alzheimer''s disease." Neuropharmacology 2021;195:108625'. 2021. ↩︎
Kano M, et al. '"Endocannabinoid-mediated LTD." Curr Opin Neurobiol 2022;77:101620'. 2022. ↩︎
Costantini E, et al. '"TNF-alpha and synaptic plasticity." Front Cell Neurosci 2023;17:1172642'. 2023. ↩︎
Lai TW, et al. '"IL-1beta and NMDA receptor function." Brain Behav Immun 2022;100:256-265'. 2022. ↩︎
Vallières L, et al. '"IL-6 and cognitive decline." Neuroscience 2021;457:235-248'. 2021. ↩︎
Stevens B, et al. '"Complement and synaptic pruning in development and disease." Neuron 2023;111:2884-2900'. 2023. ↩︎
Mattson MP. "Mitochondria and synaptic plasticity." Nat Rev Neurosci 2022;23:661-675. 2022. ↩︎
Butterfield DA, et al. '"Lipid peroxidation in neurodegeneration." Free Radic Biol Med 2021;166:321-336'. 2021. ↩︎
Gillardon F. "Protein oxidation in neurodegenerative diseases." Brain Res Bull 2020;158:78-85. 2020. ↩︎
Kamel K, et al. '"DNA damage and synaptic dysfunction." Neurobiology of Disease 2022;168:105711'. 2022. ↩︎
Shankar GM, et al. '"Synaptic activity and Alzheimer''s disease." Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2018;8:a024638'. 2018. ↩︎
Calo L, et al. '"Synaptic plasticity in Parkinson''s disease." Mov Disord 2016;31:341-351'. 2016. ↩︎
Fuchs J, et al. '"Synaptic dysfunction in ALS." Nat Rev Neurol 2020;16:97-107'. 2020. ↩︎
Chen W, et al. '"Synaptic dysfunction in frontotemporal dementia." Brain 2022;145:2513-2527'. 2022. ↩︎
Blennow K, et al. [ '"CSF synaptic biomarkers in AD." Lancet Neurol 2023;22:53-62'](https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(22). 2023. ↩︎
Vanderlinden J, et al. '"Synaptic PET imaging in neurodegeneration." J Nucl Med 2023;64:698-705'. 2023. ↩︎
Stam CJ. "Network measures in neurodegenerative diseases." Clin Neurophysiol 2022;151:145-163. 2022. ↩︎
van Dyck CH. "Anti-amyloid antibodies for Alzheimer's disease." N Engl J Med 2023;388:1845-1854. 2023. ↩︎
Barducci C, et al. '"Tau-targeted therapies." Nat Rev Drug Discov 2023;22:737-759'. 2023. ↩︎
Wong YC, et al. '"Alpha-synuclein toxicity in neurodegeneration." Nat Rev Neurosci 2023;24:285-305'. 2023. ↩︎
Lynch G, et al. '"Ampakines and synaptic plasticity." Neuropharmacology 2021;195:108628'. 2021. ↩︎
Lipton SA. "Memantine in Alzheimer's disease." Nat Rev Drug Discov 2006;5:160-170. 2006. ↩︎
Awad HN, et al. '"mGluR5 antagonists in neurodegenerative disease." Neuropharmacology 2022;217:109268'. 2022. ↩︎
Olson BC, et al. '"CSF1R inhibition and microglial function." Glia 2023;71:1683-1700'. 2023. ↩︎
Schindler SE, et al. '"TREM2 variants and neurodegenerative disease." Nat Rev Neurol 2023;19:485-498'. 2023. ↩︎
Wilcock DM. "Complement inhibition in Alzheimer's disease." Acta Neuropathol 2022;143:203-219. 2022. ↩︎
Moreira PI, et al. '"Mitochondrial protectants in neurodegeneration." J Bioenerg Biomembr 2022;54:89-101'. 2022. ↩︎
Cunnane SC, et al. '"Ketone bodies and cognitive function." Neurobiol Aging 2021;105:40-51'. 2021. ↩︎