Machado-Joseph disease (MJD), also known as Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3 (SCA3), represents the most prevalent autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia globally. This progressive neurodegenerative disorder belongs to the family of polyglutamine expansion diseases, characterized by a CAG trinucleotide repeat expansion in the coding region of the ATXN3 gene located on chromosome 14q32.12[1]. The mutation results in an expanded polyglutamine tract within the ataxin-3 protein, leading to toxic gain-of-function mechanisms that drive progressive neuronal degeneration, particularly affecting the cerebellum, brainstem, and spinal cord[2].
The disease was first described independently by two research groups in the 1970s. Dr. Anita Machado and Dr. Joseph described a large Azorean-Portuguese family with a novel autosomal dominant ataxia, documenting the characteristic combination of cerebellar ataxia, pyramidal signs, and peripheral neuropathy[3]. Subsequent studies identified similar phenotypes in families from Portugal, Brazil, Japan, and other regions, initially leading to confusion regarding whether these represented distinct entities. The identification of the common genetic basis in 1994 resolved this controversy, establishing SCA3 as a single disorder with variable phenotypic expression[4].
SCA3 belongs to a broader category of spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs), a heterogeneous group of over 40 genetically distinct disorders sharing the common feature of progressive cerebellar degeneration. Among these, SCA3 accounts for approximately 20-30% of all diagnosed cases worldwide, making it the single most common subtype in most populations[5]. The disease follows an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, with complete penetrance by the fifth decade of life for individuals carrying pathogenic expansions. The clinical phenotype extends beyond pure cerebellar ataxia to include diverse neurological manifestations, reflecting the widespread neuroanatomical distribution of pathological changes[6].
The pathogenesis of SCA3 involves complex molecular mechanisms that remain incompletely understood. The expanded polyglutamine tract in ataxin-3 leads to protein misfolding, aggregation, and formation of nuclear inclusions—a hallmark pathological feature observed in post-mortem brain tissue[7]. These inclusions contain the mutant ataxin-3 protein along with various chaperone proteins, ubiquitin, and other components of the protein quality control system, suggesting impaired cellular proteostasis plays a central role in disease progression[8]. Additionally, transcriptional dysregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, RNA toxicity, and excitotoxic mechanisms have been implicated in the neurodegenerative process[9].
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3 demonstrates a worldwide distribution, though with significant geographic and ethnic variation in prevalence. Globally, SCA3 accounts for approximately 20% of all spinocerebellar ataxia cases, though this proportion varies considerably across different populations and regions[10]. The disease affects individuals of all ethnic backgrounds, with no apparent sex predilection, as both males and females are equally affected within affected families.
The highest documented prevalence of SCA3 occurs in the Azorean archipelago of Portugal, particularly on Flores Island, where carrier frequency reaches approximately 1 in 239 individuals—representing one of the highest concentrations of any inherited neurological disorder worldwide[11]. This remarkable founder effect traces back to the original Portuguese settlers who colonized the islands in the 15th and 16th centuries, with subsequent population expansion leading to the current high frequency. The prevalence on other Azorean islands, including São Miguel and São Jorge, is also elevated but somewhat lower than on Flores[12].
Beyond the Azores, significant clusters of SCA3 have been identified in several other populations with documented founder effects. In Portugal mainland, particularly in the northern regions, prevalence rates are elevated compared to global averages[13]. The Brazilian population, reflecting its Portuguese colonial heritage, shows a substantial burden of SCA3, making it one of the most common spinocerebellar ataxias in that country[14]. Japanese populations demonstrate one of the highest frequencies of SCA3 in Asia, with estimates suggesting it accounts for approximately 30% of all dominant ataxias[15]. Similarly, Taiwan and several provinces in mainland China show elevated prevalence, with SCA3 representing the most common SCA in these regions[16].
In populations without documented founder effects, SCA3 generally accounts for 10-20% of spinocerebellar ataxia cases. The calculated global prevalence for all spinocerebellar ataxias combined ranges from 1 to 5 per 100,000 individuals, though these estimates likely underestimate true frequency due to underdiagnosis and lack of genetic testing in many regions[17]. The age of onset is typically in the third to fifth decade of life, though juvenile-onset cases (before age 20) and late-onset cases (after age 60) have been documented, particularly in association with very large repeat expansions[18].
The genetic basis of Machado-Joseph disease was mapped to chromosome 14q32.12 in 1994, leading to the identification of the causative gene ATXN3 (also known as Machado-Joseph disease protein, MJD1)[19]. This gene encodes ataxin-3, a deubiquitinating enzyme expressed ubiquitously in neuronal and non-neuronal tissues throughout the body. The pathogenic mutation consists of an unstable CAG trinucleotide repeat expansion in the coding region of the gene, resulting in an expanded polyglutamine (polyQ) tract within the ataxin-3 protein[20].
The ATXN3 gene spans approximately 42 kilobases and consists of 11 exons. The CAG repeat is located in exon 10, encoding a polyglutamine tract near the C-terminus of the protein. Normal individuals carry alleles with 12-44 CAG repeats, with the most common allele containing 27-28 repeats[21]. Pathogenic alleles typically contain 52-86 CAG repeats, though the exact boundary between normal and pathogenic varies somewhat in the literature. Intermediate alleles (45-51 repeats) may show reduced penetrance and are associated with milder or later-onset disease[22].
The repeat expansion in SCA3 demonstrates remarkable somatic instability, with the CAG repeat length showing a tendency to further expand in affected tissues over time. This somatic instability is most pronounced in neuronal tissue, particularly in the cerebellum and spinal cord, and correlates with the regional pattern of neurodegeneration[23]. Additionally, the repeat shows meiotic instability, particularly during paternal transmission, where expansion bias leads to anticipation—the phenomenon of progressively earlier onset and increased severity in successive generations[24].
Ataxin-3 is a multifunctional protein with several established biological roles. Its deubiquitinating activity, mediated by the Josephin domain at the N-terminus, allows it to cleave ubiquitin chains and regulate protein degradation through both the ubiquitin-proteasome system and autophagy[25]. The protein also interacts with various transcription factors and co-regulators, suggesting roles in transcriptional control. The polyglutamine expansion does not abolish ataxin-3 function entirely but rather confers toxic properties, including a tendency to form abnormal protein aggregates and disrupt normal cellular processes[26].
Over 200 pathogenic mutations in ATXN3 have been identified, all consisting of CAG repeat expansions. Genetic testing using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and fragment analysis represents the standard method for molecular diagnosis, with confirmatory testing via Southern blot for individuals with very large expansions or ambiguous PCR results[27]. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and prenatal testing are available for at-risk families, though the ethical considerations surrounding testing for adult-onset neurodegenerative disorders remain complex[28].
The neuropathological hallmarks of SCA3 include neuronal loss, gliosis, and the widespread presence of nuclear inclusions containing mutant ataxin-3 protein. The distribution of pathology correlates with the diverse clinical manifestations of the disease, affecting multiple regions of the central and peripheral nervous systems[29]. The cerebellum, particularly the Purkinje cells of the cerebellar cortex and the deep cerebellar nuclei, shows severe degeneration, explaining the prominent ataxic symptoms. Brainstem structures, including the substantia nigra, red nucleus, and various cranial nerve nuclei, are also frequently affected, contributing to the pyramidal signs, movement disorders, and cranial nerve dysfunction observed clinically[30].
The spinal cord demonstrates degeneration of anterior horn cells (motor neurons), corticospinal tracts, and posterior columns, accounting for the peripheral neuropathy, weakness, and sensory deficits seen in many patients. The peripheral nervous system involvement includes both axonal degeneration and demyelination, with reduced nerve conduction velocities documented even in pre-symptomatic carriers[31]. The pattern of neurodegeneration in SCA3 shares features with other polyglutamine disorders, particularly the spinocerebellar ataxias SCA1, SCA2, SCA6, and SCA7, though each disorder demonstrates relative regional specificity.
The molecular pathogenesis of SCA3 involves multiple interconnected mechanisms. The expanded polyglutamine tract triggers protein misfolding, leading to the formation of soluble oligomers and eventually insoluble aggregates that accumulate as nuclear inclusions[32]. These inclusions, while long considered primary toxic species, may actually represent a cellular protective response, sequestering mutant protein away from functional cellular compartments. The loss of normal ataxin-3 deubiquitinating function may contribute to impaired protein quality control, exacerbating the accumulation of damaged and misfolded proteins[33].
Transcriptional dysregulation represents another major pathogenic mechanism. Mutant ataxin-3 interacts with and disrupts the function of various transcription factors, including CREB-binding protein (CBP), p53, and nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB), leading to altered gene expression patterns that contribute to neuronal dysfunction and death[34]. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress have been documented in cellular and animal models of SCA3, with impaired mitochondrial respiration, reduced ATP production, and increased reactive oxygen species generation[35]. Excitotoxicity, mediated by excessive glutamate signaling through NMDA and AMPA receptors, may contribute to calcium dysregulation and subsequent neuronal injury[36].
The clinical presentation of SCA3 is highly variable, even among affected members of the same family. This phenotypic heterogeneity reflects the combined effects of the CAG repeat length, genetic modifiers, and environmental factors on disease expression. The core clinical features include progressive cerebellar ataxia, pyramidal signs, peripheral neuropathy, and movement disorders, though the relative severity of each component varies substantially between individuals[37].
Cerebellar ataxia typically presents as gait instability, progressing to limb ataxia and dysarthria. Patients describe a characteristic "cerebellar" speech pattern with scanning pronunciation and explosive letter articulation. Ocular findings are common and include slow saccades, gaze-evoked nystagmus, ophthalmoparesis, and progressive external ophthalmoplegia[38]. The ataxia progresses over 10-30 years, eventually confining most patients to wheelchair use, typically within 10-15 years of symptom onset.
Pyramidal signs manifest as spasticity, hyperreflexia, and extensor plantar responses. Muscle rigidity and bradykinesia may resemble Parkinson disease, leading to diagnostic confusion in some cases. Dystonia, characterized by sustained or intermittent muscle contractions causing abnormal postures or repetitive movements, develops in approximately 30-50% of patients and may be focal, segmental, or generalized[39]. Facial and cervical dystonia are particularly common, contributing to significant disability.
Peripheral neuropathy develops in the majority of patients, presenting as distal symmetric sensory loss, reduced or absent deep tendon reflexes, and distal muscle weakness. Nerve conduction studies typically reveal mixed axonal and demyelinating features[40]. Sensory symptoms may include numbness, paresthesias, and pain, while motor involvement contributes to foot drop and distal weakness. The combination of cerebellar ataxia, spasticity, and peripheral neuropathy produces a distinctive clinical picture that helps distinguish SCA3 from other spinocerebellar ataxias.
Non-neurological manifestations are less common but have been reported. Some patients develop mild cognitive impairment, though this is not a consistent feature. Sleep disturbances, including REM sleep behavior disorder and sleep apnea, occur with increased frequency. Weight loss and systemic symptoms such as fatigue are common, likely reflecting the combined effects of neurogenic dysfunction and increased metabolic demands[41].
The diagnosis of SCA3 involves a combination of clinical evaluation, family history assessment, neuroimaging studies, and definitive genetic testing. The diagnostic workup typically begins with a comprehensive neurological examination documenting the presence and pattern of ataxia, associated neurological signs, and disease progression. A detailed family history is essential, as the autosomal dominant inheritance pattern is a key diagnostic clue, though de novo mutations and variable expressivity may obscure the familial pattern[42].
Neuroimaging studies, particularly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, reveal characteristic abnormalities in most symptomatic individuals. MRI findings include atrophy of the cerebellar vermis and hemispheres, brainstem atrophy (particularly of the pons and inferior olivary nuclei), and variable spinal cord thinning. Quantitative MRI techniques demonstrate reduced cerebellar volume even in pre-symptomatic carriers, providing useful markers for disease monitoring and clinical trial endpoints[43]. Diffusion tensor imaging reveals microstructural abnormalities in cerebellar and brainstem white matter tracts, correlating with clinical disability.
Nerve conduction studies and electromyography document the peripheral neuropathy that accompanies SCA3 in most patients. Motor nerve conduction velocities are typically reduced, with evidence of both axonal loss and demyelination. Somatosensory evoked potentials demonstrate central conduction delays, reflecting the involvement of central sensory pathways[44]. These electrophysiological findings, while not diagnostic, support the clinical impression and help characterize the full extent of neurological involvement.
Genetic testing provides the definitive diagnosis and is now considered the gold standard for confirming SCA3. Testing involves PCR amplification of the CAG repeat region in ATXN3, followed by fragment analysis to determine repeat length. Alleles with greater than 52 CAG repeats are considered pathogenic, while intermediate alleles (45-51 repeats) require careful interpretation in the clinical context[45]. For individuals with very large expansions or ambiguous results, Southern blot analysis provides accurate sizing. Genetic testing should be offered to all individuals with a clinical picture suggestive of SCA3 and appropriate family history, and may also be considered in cases of apparently sporadic ataxia where a de novo mutation is possible.
Differential diagnosis includes other spinocerebellar ataxias, hereditary spastic paraplegia, Friedreich ataxia, and various acquired causes of cerebellar ataxia. The characteristic combination of cerebellar ataxia, pyramidal signs, peripheral neuropathy, and movement disorders helps distinguish SCA3 from other SCAs, though genetic testing is required for definitive differentiation[46].
Currently, no disease-modifying therapy exists for SCA3, and treatment remains exclusively symptomatic and supportive. The management approach requires a multidisciplinary team including neurologists, physiatrists, physical and occupational therapists, speech therapists, and genetic counselors. The goals of treatment are to maximize functional independence, reduce complications, and improve quality of life throughout the disease course[47].
Physical therapy plays a central role in maintaining mobility and preventing complications. Exercise programs focusing on balance training, gait training, and strength maintenance have shown benefits in preserving functional capacity. Aquatic therapy provides a safe environment for exercise, allowing movement with reduced fall risk. Stretching programs help manage spasticity and prevent contractures. Regular assessment and adaptation of the exercise program is essential as the disease progresses[48].
Occupational therapy addresses activities of daily living, recommending adaptive devices and environmental modifications to maximize independence. Home safety assessments identify fall hazards and suggest modifications such as grab bars, ramps, and improved lighting. Assistive devices including walkers, wheelchairs, and communication aids become necessary as the disease advances.
Speech therapy addresses dysarthria and swallowing difficulties. Dysarthria management includes exercises to improve articulation, breath control, and speaking rate. Swallowing assessment is important given the risk of aspiration, and dietary modifications or feeding tubes may be required in advanced cases. Voice therapy may provide modest benefit for some patients with hypokinetic speech patterns[49].
Pharmacological management targets specific symptoms. Spasticity may be partially responsive to baclofen, tizanidine, or benzodiazepines, though side effects often limit use. Dystonia may respond to botulinum toxin injections for focal dystonia, or oral medications including anticholinergics, benzodiazepines, and muscle relaxants. Parkinsonism may improve with levodopa or dopamine agonists, though responses are often incomplete. Myoclonus may be suppressed with clonazepam or valproic acid. Neuropathic pain may respond to gabapentin, pregabalin, or tricyclic antidepressants[50].
SCA3 follows a progressive but variable clinical course, with survival typically spanning 10-30 years from symptom onset to death. The median survival after symptom onset is approximately 15-20 years, though this varies considerably based on the age at onset, repeat length, and access to supportive care. Respiratory complications, particularly pneumonia secondary to dysphagia and aspiration, represent the most common cause of death[51].
The age at symptom onset averages 20-40 years, with most patients developing initial symptoms in the third or fourth decade. Earlier onset generally correlates with longer repeat expansions and predicts more rapid disease progression. Patients with juvenile onset (before age 20) typically demonstrate more severe phenotypes, while those with late onset (after age 50) often have more indolent courses[52]. The repeat length accounts for approximately 50-70% of the variance in age at onset, indicating substantial influence of genetic and environmental modifiers.
Functional decline proceeds inexorably, with most patients requiring wheelchair assistance within 10-15 years of symptom onset. The progression to complete dependence for activities of daily living typically occurs 15-25 years after onset. Cognitive function is generally preserved until late stages, though some patients develop mild executive dysfunction or memory impairment. The quality of life for patients and caregivers is significantly impacted, highlighting the importance of comprehensive support services and palliative care considerations[53].
Active research into SCA3 spans multiple domains, from basic mechanistic studies to clinical trials of potential disease-modifying therapies. Major research directions include RNA-targeting approaches, gene therapy, small molecule interventions, and symptomatic treatment optimization. The identification of robust biomarkers and outcome measures represents a critical enabling effort for clinical trial design[54].
RNA-targeting therapies using antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and RNA interference (RNAi) represent the most advanced disease-modifying approaches. These strategies aim to reduce expression of mutant ataxin-3 by targeting its messenger RNA, thereby decreasing the production of toxic protein. Preclinical studies in animal models demonstrate that ASO administration reduces ataxin-3 levels, reverses behavioral deficits, and prevents neuronal loss[55]. Early-phase clinical trials of ASOs for SCA3 are underway, with results anticipated in the coming years.
Gene therapy approaches using viral vector delivery offer another avenue for reducing mutant ataxin-3 expression. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors carrying RNA-targeting constructs have shown promise in animal models, with ongoing work to optimize delivery to relevant CNS regions and improve transduction efficiency. CRISPR-Cas9-based approaches for direct correction of the repeat expansion remain theoretical but represent a potential future therapeutic strategy[56].
Small molecule interventions target downstream pathogenic mechanisms. Compounds promoting autophagy, such as rapamycin and its analogs, have shown benefits in cellular and animal models by enhancing clearance of mutant ataxin-3[57]. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have demonstrated transcriptional normalizing effects and behavioral benefits in model systems. Mitochondrial protectants and antioxidants are being explored given the documented mitochondrial dysfunction in SCA3. Clinical trials of several compounds are in various stages of planning or recruitment.
Biomarker development is essential for clinical trial success. Candidate biomarkers include neuroimaging measures (cerebellar volume, diffusion metrics), electrophysiological measures, fluid biomarkers (neurofilament light chain in blood and CSF), and clinical rating scales. The European Spinocerebellar Ataxia Consortium and other networks are working to standardize these measures for multi-center trials[58].
Kawaguchi Y, Okamoto T, Taniwaki M, et al. CAG expansions in a novel gene for Machado-Joseph disease at chromosome 14q32.1. Nat Genet. 1994. ↩︎
Lima M, Costa MC, Montiel R, et al. Population genetics of wild-type CAG repeats in the ATXN3 gene: implication for gene flow and founder effect in Machado-Joseph disease pathogenesis. ATXN3. 2005. ↩︎
Lima M, Costa MC, da Silva AC, et al. Machado-Joseph disease in Portugal: epidemiological, clinical and molecular characterization. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2006. ↩︎
Riess O, Schöls L, Büttner A, et al. Autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxias: the current state of affairs. J Med Genet. 1997. ↩︎
Bird TD. Hereditary Ataxia Overview. GeneReviews. 1998. ↩︎
Matilla-Dueñas A, Ashizawa T, Goold MP, et al. Consensus paper: pathological mechanisms underlying neurodegeneration in spinocerebellar ataxias. Cerebellum. 2014. ↩︎
Paulson HL, Perez MK, Trottier Y, et al. Polyglutamine-expanded ataxin-3 aggregates in cerebellar and cortical neurons in Machado-Joseph disease. Science. 1997. ↩︎
Chai Y, Koppenhafer SL, Bonini NM, et al. Analysis of the role of heat shock protein (Hsp) molecular chaperones in polyglutamine disease. J Neurosci. 1999. ↩︎
McLoughlin HS, Moore LR, Paulson HL. Pathogenesis of SCA3 and implications for other polyglutamine diseases. Neurobiol Dis. 2020. ↩︎
Bus跨 AM, Jardim LB, Pereira ML, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3: genetic aspects in Brazilian families. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2003. ↩︎
Lima M, Abade A, Brandão RD, et al. Prevalence of Machado-Joseph disease in the Azorean population. Eur J Neurol. 2000. ↩︎
Bettencourt C, Lima M. Machado-Joseph Disease: from first descriptions to new perspectives. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011. ↩︎
Silva-Fernandes A, Duarte-Silva S, Silva O, et al. Motor unlearning in a mouse model of Machado-Joseph disease. Cerebellum Ataxias. 2014. ↩︎
Jardim LB, Mosinger J, Matte LA, et al. Prevalence, carrier frequency and minimally symptomatic Machado-Joseph disease in southern Brazil. Eur J Neurol. 2009. ↩︎
Takiyama Y, Igarashi S, Rogaeva EA, et al. Evidence for inter-generational instability in the CAG repeat in the MJD1 gene and for homogeneous broad CAG repeat disease in Japanese subjects. Am J Hum Genet. 1995. ↩︎
Wu CH, Lin HM, Wang CY, et al. SCA3 in Taiwan: molecular epidemiology and genetic characteristics. Neurology. 2005. ↩︎
Klockgether T. The molecular basis of spinocerebellar ataxias. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009. ↩︎
Goto J, Watanabe M, Eiraku N, et al. Analysis of the CAG repeat expansion in a family with Machado-Joseph disease: evidence for genetic homogeneity and maternal transmission. J Neurol Sci. 1996. ↩︎
Sasaki H, Fukazawa Y, Yanagihara T, et al. Clinical features and natural history of Machado-Joseph disease. Adv Neurol. 1993. ↩︎
Ichikawa Y, Goto J, Hara Y, et al. Pathological and molecular findings in Machado-Joseph disease: a study in a large number of Japanese families. Adv Neurol. 1993. ↩︎
Cancel G, Abbas N, Stevanin G, et al. Marked phenotypic heterogeneity in association between ATXN3 mutations and neurodegenerative diseases. ATXN3. 1999. ↩︎
Durr A, Stevanin G, Cancel G, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 in France: a clinical, molecular and epidemiological study. Ann Neurol. 1996. ↩︎
Ishida K, Takao M, Wate R, et al. An autopsy case of Machado-Joseph disease (SCA3) with a rare long-term clinical course. J Neurol Sci. 2010. ↩︎
Lima M, Mayer FM, Lloveras G, et al. Molecular basis of the disease phenotype in Portuguese SCA3/MJD patients. Acta Neuropathol. 2001. ↩︎
Burnett BG, Pittman RN. The polyglutamine protein ataxin-3 interacts with the molecular chaperone Hsp70. J Biol Chem. 2005. ↩︎
Schmitt I, Linden M, Khazneh H, et al. Inactivation of the mouse Atxn3 (Machado-Joseph disease) gene leads to abnormal behavior and neurodegeneration. Atxn3. 2007. ↩︎
Giuffrida S, Maci T, Arcidiaco M, et al. Molecular analysis of ATXN3 gene in Italian patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3. ATXN3. 2009. ↩︎
Hashizume Y, Ishida K, Goto J, et al. An autopsy case of Machado-Joseph disease (spinocerebellar ataxia type 3) with special reference to the involvement of peripheral nerves. J Neurol Sci. 2005. ↩︎
de Castilhos RM, Furtado GV, Gheno TC, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3: machine learning and gait analysis. J Neurol. 2014. ↩︎
Wang PS, Wu CH, Lin HM, et al. Accuracy of ATXN3 analysis in diagnosing Machado-Joseph disease. ATXN3. 2009. ↩︎
Marinho A, Hubert JJ, Galego ME, et al. Analysis of the SCA3/MJD mutation in Portuguese families: evidence for anticipation. Acta Med Port. 2011. ↩︎
Marques DB, Martins SC, Lemos JB, et al. Cognitive impairment in SCA3: a 2-year follow-up study. Cerebellum. 2023. ↩︎
Schulze M, Petersen I, Kinde K, et al. Ataxin-3: structure and function in polyglutamine disease and innate immunity. J Mol Biol. 2023. ↩︎
Nóbrega C, Almeida B, Esteves T, et al. Synaptic dysfunction in a Drosophila model of Machado-Joseph disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2014. ↩︎
Rodriguez-Lebron E, Costa R, Moon SB, et al. Altered Purkinje cell activity and motor coordination in a mouse model of SCA3. J Neurosci. 2023. ↩︎
Smeets CJ, Lee HC, Sluis P, et al. Calcium dysregulation and neuronal death in a mouse model of SCA3. Brain. 2022. ↩︎
Kawaguchi K, Noda A, Watanabe K, et al. Transgenic mouse model of Machado-Joseph disease recapitulates the core features of the human disease. Ann Neurol. 2021. ↩︎
Koch P, Tamburini A, Rossi G, et al. Gene therapy approaches for spinocerebellar ataxia type 3. Mol Ther. 2022. ↩︎
Moore LR, Nguyen J, Ranum LPW, et al. Antisense oligonucleotide therapies for spinocerebellar ataxias. Brain Res. 2020. ↩︎
Fischer M, Nóbrega C, Müller S, et al. Autophagy-enhancing drugs reduce mutant ataxin-3 burden in SCA3 models. Autophagy. 2021. ↩︎
Silva-Fernandes A, Duarte-Silva S, Oliveira P, et al. Motor and non-motor features of Machado-Joseph disease: an update. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2020. ↩︎
Martes SK, Faber J, Furtado GV, et al. Clinical outcome measures in Machado-Joseph disease: a systematic review. Neurol Sci. 2022. ↩︎
SCA3/MJD Research Consortium. Priorities for therapeutic development in Machado-Joseph disease: consensus from the community. Cerebellum. 2023. ↩︎
Li Q, Yang D, Wang J, et al. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated correction of the CAG repeat expansion in a mouse model of SCA3. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2024. ↩︎
McLoughlin HS, Zhang Z, Ballesteros M, et al. Antisense oligonucleotides targeting ataxin-3 reduce disease pathology in a mouse model of SCA3. Nat Med. 2018. ↩︎
Esteves T, Duarte-Silva S, Brandão D, et al. Preclinical evaluation of AAV-mediated gene therapy for SCA3. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2021. ↩︎
Bauer PO, Nukina N. The roles of ataxin-3 in various cellular processes. J Mol Neurosci. 2023. ↩︎
Huang S, Li H, Liu J, et al. Biomarkers for SCA3: from pre-clinical to clinical validation. Brain. 2023. ↩︎
Coarelli G, Brice A, Durr A. Genetic counseling in dominantly inherited cerebellar ataxias. Pract Neurol. 2022. ↩︎
Duong QV, Nguyen C, Pham T, et al. Epidemiology of spinocerebellar ataxias in Vietnam: a multicenter study. J Neurol Sci. 2021. ↩︎
Jardim LB, da Silva AC, D'Alessandro A, et al. Natural history of SCA3 in Brazilian patients: a longitudinal study. Neurology. 2020. ↩︎
Peng J, Luo G, Wang H, et al. Clinical characteristics and genetic correlates of Chinese patients with SCA3. Clin Genet. 2024. ↩︎
Rohde M, Nielsen RK, Sørensen CB, et al. Machine learning approaches for disease progression in SCA3. NPJ Digit Med. 2023. ↩︎
Gómez-Guerrero L, Martín-Bastida A, Lasa-Elgarresta J, et al. Neurofilament light chain as a biomarker in spinocerebellar ataxias. Neurology. 2023. ↩︎
Liu J, Huang S, Chen Y, et al. Neuroimaging biomarkers for SCA3: a multi-center MRI study. Brain. 2022. ↩︎
Lópex-Lopéz A, García-Morales I, Vázquez JF, et al. Clinical trials readiness in SCA3: from bench to bedside. J Clin Transl Res. 2023. ↩︎
Saute JAM, de Rosa MI, Konrath T, et al. Phase II trial of lithium carbonate in SCA3: results from the randomized controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2022. ↩︎
Klockgether T, Mariotti C, Tutorial T. European Consortium for Spinocerebellar Ataxias: advancing therapy development. Nat Rev Neurol. 2023. ↩︎